Australian Open: Djokovic held alone with out cellphone at airport over visa row

The precise grounds for Djokovic’s exemption are unclear, though his opposition to vaccination is well-known, fuelling the criticism inside Melbourne, Victoria and throughout Australia. Djokovic is searching for to win his twenty first grand slam singles title, overtaking Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal, on the match starting on 17 January.

Scott Morrison, the Australian prime minister, added his voice to the furore, saying Djokovic’s presence in Melbourne was nonetheless not sure and he could be “on the subsequent aircraft residence” if he’s unable to supply proof of his medical exemption. “If that proof is inadequate, then he gained’t be handled any completely different to anybody else and he’ll be on the subsequent aircraft residence. There ought to be no particular guidelines for Novak Djokovic in any respect. None by any means.”

Victorian officers had been requested by the federal authorities to formally assist Djokovic’s visa software, which led Jaala Pulford, the state’s performing sports activities minister, to announce on Twitter that the state wouldn’t be doing so.

“The federal authorities has requested if we are going to assist Novak Djokovic’s visa software to enter Australia,” Pulford mentioned. “We is not going to be offering Novak Djokovic with particular person visa software assist to take part within the 2022 Australian Open grand slam [tournament]. We’ve at all times been clear on two factors: visa approvals are a matter for the federal authorities, and medical exemptions are a matter for medical doctors.”

Djokovic introduced on Tuesday that he could be flying to Australia after receiving an “exemption permission”, quite than vaccinating himself in opposition to Covid, instantly prompting backlash from the Australian public and politicians.

Because the nine-times Australian Open champion launched into his journey to Melbourne, criticism of him hardened. Karen Andrews, the federal residence affairs minister, launched an announcement suggesting the federal authorities may revoke Djokovic’s exemption except he supplied “acceptable proof” of the explanations for his medical exemption on the border.

“Any particular person searching for to enter Australia should adjust to our strict border necessities,” Andrews wrote. “Whereas the Victorian authorities and Tennis Australia could allow a non-vaccinated participant to compete within the Australian Open, it’s the Commonwealth authorities that may implement our necessities on the Australian border.”

Victorians have endured prolonged lockdowns and there may be vital nervousness about rising Covid circumstances as Australia struggles with the Omicron surge. On Wednesday Victoria recorded a report 17,636 new circumstances and an increase in hospitalisations, prompting non-urgent elective surgical procedures to be lowered.

Moreover, Morrison’s authorities is beneath fireplace for its dealing with of Covid and his refusal to make fundamental provisions free or inexpensive. Easy lateral stream exams are bought out at supermarkets and pharmacies throughout the town, most obtainable are bought for round A$30 (£16) and others have been topic to cost gouging from some firms.

The Australian tennis legend Rod Laver mentioned in an interview with the Herald Solar, stating that Djokovic ought to reveal the explanation he was granted a medical exemption. “If he’s acquired a purpose for [the exemption] then … we should always realize it,” Laver mentioned. “Sure, you’re an amazing participant and also you’ve carried out and gained so many tournaments, so, it might’t be bodily. So what’s the downside?”

Djokovic’s fellow world No 1, Ashleigh Barty, was requested about Djokovic after her opening match of the season in Adelaide. Barty famous the difficulties confronted in Victoria however she declined to wade into the controversy round Djokovic.

“I understand how onerous it has been for Australians throughout our nation, however specifically Victorians have had an actual tough trot during the last 18 months and two years,” Barty mentioned. “I perceive why they could be pissed off with the choice. Finally I’ve no real interest in talking about Novak’s medical historical past. It’s not my choice. These selections are made. They’re utterly out of my management.”

Shortly after Djokovic introduced his “exemption permission”, Tennis Australia clarified that Djokovic had been granted a medical exemption and that his software was reviewed by two separate impartial medical panels, firstly from Tennis Australia after which supplied by the Victorian authorities. The non-public info of every applicant was redacted. Craig Tiley, the Tennis Australia chief government, revealed 26 tennis players and assist workers had utilized for exemptions with solely a handful receiving them.

On Wednesday Tiley continued to stress the robustness of the method that led to Djokovic receiving an exception however he acknowledged the general public’s frustrations. “A few of you’ll be upset about the truth that Novak has are available in due to his statements of the previous couple of years round vaccination,” Tiley mentioned.

“Nonetheless, it’s finally as much as him to debate with the general public his situation in case you select to do this, and the explanation why he obtained an exemption. We as an occasion, additionally as a state, as a rustic, will do every little thing we probably can to provide everybody an equal alternative to come back into the nation.”

Last year Djokovic said he was “opposed to vaccination” and added: “I wouldn’t need to be compelled by somebody to take a vaccine so as to have the ability to journey … But when it turns into obligatory, what’s going to occur? I must decide.”